Dubya's Personal Blog

Welcome to my personal thoughts and contemtat . . . , comptmepta . . . , contemplash . . . , well, you know, things I think about. I try to enter my ideas on a regular basis, but what with running the free world, and being there for my darling wife, I don't have much free time. Only about four or five hours a day. So, enjoy!

Name:
Location: Washington, D.C., United States

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Amen to Tiny Men

I gave my speech 'bout havin' a Constitutional Amenment to pertect marriage, an' people started talkin' 'bout the seperation of church an' state an' how I shouldn't let my biblical views influence the Constitution. But if the foundin' fathers didn't want us to be biblical, then why did they call it a Constitutional Amenment? Try to answer that one all you progresso lovin' liberals.

But then, get this. Someone sends me an article by Bob Cesca where he talks 'bout li'l tiny men livin' in sperm. What th' heck is that all 'bout?!?

I don't think there's no tiny li'l men in my testimacles. An' jus' fer the record, thinkin' 'bout it doesn't like excite me or nuthin'. Not that there's anythin' wrong with that if it excites someone else, unless they're male an' plannin' on gettin' married to the li'l tiny men. 'Cause we respecks all peoples; we jus' don't wanna desanctify marriage or nuthin', 'cause the majority of all marriages that don't result in divorce, spousal abuse, or murder-homicides tend to be successful.

Marriage is an institution, an' all people who're married should be treated as if they're institutionalized.

Amen.

1 Comments:

Blogger Joey Polanski said...

Th werd "men" occurs TWICE in th werd "amendment", Mr Presdent. This proves that th foundin fathrs wannad men t unite wit men -- a little t & a on th side, but only a d in btween em.

A constitutional amendment bannin gay marridge woud be unconstitutional ... or sompm.

6:12 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Locations of visitors to this page